Knowledge Is NOT Belief for Sufficient (Objective and Subjective) Reason

Logos and Episteme 6 (2):237-243 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Mark Schroeder has recently proposed a new analysis of knowledge. I examine that analysis and show that it fails. More specifically, I show that it faces a problem all too familiar from the post-Gettier literature, namely, that it is delivers the wrong verdict in fake barn cases.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
357 ( #21,257 of 69,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #27,723 of 69,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.