Knowledge Is NOT Belief for Sufficient (Objective and Subjective) Reason

Logos and Episteme 6 (2):237-243 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Mark Schroeder has recently proposed a new analysis of knowledge. I examine that analysis and show that it fails. More specifically, I show that it faces a problem all too familiar from the post-Gettier literature, namely, that it is delivers the wrong verdict in fake barn cases.

Author's Profile

Daniel Whiting
University of Southampton


Added to PP

464 (#21,717)

6 months
67 (#23,225)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?