Social mirrors and shared experiential worlds

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We humans have a formidable armamentarium of social display behaviours, including song-and-dance, the visual arts, and role-play. Of these, role-play is probably the crucial adaptation which makes us most different from other apes. Human childhood, a sheltered period of ‘extended irresponsibility’, allows us to develop our powers of make-believe and role-play, prerequisites for human cooperation, culture, and reflective consciousness. Social mirror theory, originating with Dilthey, Baldwin, Cooley and Mead, holds that there cannot be mirrors in the mind without mirrors in society. I will present evidence from the social and behavioural sciences to argue that self-awareness depends on social mirrors and shared experiential worlds. The dependence of reflectivity on shared experience requires some reframing of the ‘hard problem’, and suggests a non-trivial answer to the zombie question
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WHISMA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Self in the Mirror.Prinz, Wolfgang

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-14

Total downloads
34 ( #30,385 of 36,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #21,305 of 36,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.