Natural resources and government responsiveness

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):84-105 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pogge and Wenar have recently argued that we are responsible for the persistence of the so-called ‘resource curse’. But their analyses are limited in important ways. I trace these limitations to their undue focus on the ways in which the international rules governing resource transactions undermine government accountability. To overcome the shortcomings of Pogge’s and Wenar’s analyses, I propose a normative framework organized around the social value of government responsiveness and discuss the implications of adopting this framework for future normative assessment of the resource curse and our relationships to it.

Author's Profile

David Wiens
University of California, San Diego

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-21

Downloads
1,112 (#12,160)

6 months
112 (#44,438)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?