Gradational accuracy and nonclassical semantics

Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):513-537 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Joyce (1998) gives an argument for probabilism: the doctrine that rational credences should conform to the axioms of probability. In doing so, he provides a distinctive take on how the normative force of probabilism relates to the injunction to believe what is true. But Joyce presupposes that the truth values of the propositions over which credences are defined are classical. I generalize the core of Joyce’s argument to remove this presupposition. On the same assumptions as Joyce uses, the credences of a rational agent should always be weighted averages of truth value assignments. In the special case where the truth values are classical, the weighted averages of truth value assignments are exactly the probability functions. But in the more general case, probabilistic axioms formulated in terms of classical logic are violated—but we will show that generalized versions of the axioms formulated in terms of non-classical logics are satisfied
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILGAA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
General Semantics.Lewis, David

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rational Illogicality.Williams, J. Robert G.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-06-06

Total downloads
88 ( #21,069 of 35,416 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #22,155 of 35,416 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.