Paul K. Moser and the End of Christian Apologetics as We Know It

Philosophia Christi 17 (1):127-149 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In Paul Moser’s view, philosophical arguments of natural theology are irrelevant as evidence for God’s existence. I argue that embracing Moser’s view would bring about the end to the project and practice of Christian apologetics as we know it. I draw out implications from Moser’s work on religious epistemology for the project of Christian apologetics. I sketch what Christian apologetics would look like if one were to embrace Moser’s call to eliminate arguments as evidence for God existence. The result of embracing Moser-style apologetics is apologetics without argument. I argue that Moserian apologetics should be rejected.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #40,283 of 50,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,646 of 50,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.