Against Reflective Equilibrium for Logical Theorizing

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I extend my earlier argument that abductive comparisons of logical theories are problematic to cover the piecemeal approaches like reflective equilibrium. I suggest that piecemeal approaches like reflective equilibrium face a version of the challenge Wright and Shapiro initially raised against Quine's web of belief picture. But solving Wright's problem reopens up vulnerability to decision theoretic cycles, as well as potentially abandoning the anti-exceptionalist standpoint. I close by sketching what the best piecemeal approach would look like
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WOOARE
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-13

Total downloads
44 ( #27,574 of 35,449 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #7,473 of 35,449 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.