Semantic pathology and the open pair [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Vagueness and Contradiction (2001), Roy Sorensen defends and extends his epistemic account of vagueness. In the process, he appeals to connections between vagueness and semantic paradox. These appeals come mainly in Chapter 11, where Sorensen offers a solution to what he calls the no-no paradox—a “neglected cousin” of the more famous liar—and attempts to use this solution as a precedent for an epistemic account of the sorites paradox. This strategy is problematic for Sorensen’s project, however, since, as we establish, he fails to resolve the semantic pathology of the no-no paradox.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WOOSPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Truthmakers, Paradox and Plausibility.Armour-Garb, Bradley & Woodbridge, James A.
The Pathology of Validity.Woodbridge, James A. & Armour-Garb, Bradley
Paradoxical Hypodoxes.Billon, Alexandre

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
154 ( #15,994 of 37,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #34,106 of 37,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.