Isolating Correct Reasoning

In Magdalena Balcerak Jackson & Brendan Balcerak Jackson (eds.), Reasoning: New Essays on Theoretical and Practical Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper tries to do three things. First, it tries to make it plausible that correct rules of reasoning do not always preserve justification: in other words, if you begin with a justified attitude, and reason correctly from that premise, it can nevertheless happen that you’ll nevertheless arrive at an unjustified attitude. Attempts to show that such cases in fact involve following an incorrect rule of reasoning cannot be vindicated. Second, it also argues that correct rules of reasoning do not even correspond to permissions of “structural rationality”: it is not always structurally permissible to base an attitude on other attitudes from which it follows by correct reasoning. Third, from these observations it tries to build a somewhat positive account of the correctness of rules of reasoning as a more sui generis notion irreducible to either justification or structural rationality. This account vindicates an important unity of theoretical and practical reasoning as well as a qualified version of the thesis that deductive logic supplies correct rules of reasoning.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WORICR
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Without Justification.Sutton, Jonathan

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-05-22

Total views
86 ( #26,501 of 40,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #13,647 of 40,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.