Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity

Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I consider an argument of Harvey Siegel's according to which there can be no hypothetical normativity anywhere unless there is categorical normativity in epistemology. The argument fails because it falsely assumes people must be bound by epistemic norms in order to have justified beliefs
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
252 ( #22,250 of 58,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #21,290 of 58,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.