The Ethics of Trigger Warnings

Teaching Ethics 16 (1):17-35 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Trigger warnings captured national attention in 2014 when students from several U.S. universities called for inclusion of the warnings on course syllabi and in classrooms. Opinions spread through news outlets across the spectrum, and those weighing in were quick to pronounce trigger warnings as either unnecessary coddling and an affront to free speech, or as a responsible pedagogical practice that treats students with respect and minimizes harm. Put simply, the debate about trigger warnings has followed the trajectory of many debates in the public sphere: The issue has largely been framed by highly committed opponents and proponents whose positions represent the extremes of the spectrum. Lost has been the nuance that an issue like trigger warnings necessarily requires. This article examines trigger warnings—particularly the call for trigger warnings on university campuses—from a pluralistic ethical perspective and addresses the question: When, if ever, are trigger warnings ethically appropriate?
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
1544-4031
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WYATEO-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-04

Total downloads
37 ( #151,867 of 29,835 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #16,761 of 29,835 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.