Non-Holistic Meaning Anatomism and the No-Principled-Basis Consideration

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore (1999/2002) frame the debate over meaning holism in terms of a distinction between meaning atomism and meaning anatomism. The former holds that the meaning of an expression E is determined by some relation between E and some extra-linguistic entity. The latter holds that the meaning of E is at least partly determined by some of E’s “inward” relations (IRs) with other expressions in the very language. They (1992) argue that meaning anatomism inevitably collapses into meaning holism, which is the view that the meaning of E is determined by E’s IRs with every other expression in the very language because there is no principled distinction for the anatomist to divide the meaning-determining IRs from the non-meaning-determining ones. In response, the non-holistic anatomist urges that Fodor and Lepore’s no-principled-basis consideration is groundless because the lack of a generally accepted criterion for such a distinction does not undermine the viability of the distinction itself. While this point is well taken, I think that Fodor and Lepore are onto an important question here. That is, what does it make non-holistic anatomism distinctive from its holistic counterpart if without a principled basis for the distinction among IRs? I look into this question and give an alternative argument from Fodor and Lepore’s to suggest that non-holistic anatomism cannot bypass the no-principled-basis consideration. The non-holistic anatomist will need a principled distinction in kind between IRs to back her point.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YENNMA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Holism: A Shopper's Guide.Fodor, Jerry A. & Lepore, Ernest
Meaning.Horwich, Paul
Analyticity Reconsidered.Boghossian, Paul Artin
Holism: A Shopper's Guide.Fodor, Jerry & Lepore, Ernest

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-29

Total views
144 ( #20,351 of 41,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #7,839 of 41,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.