Talents and Interests: A Hegelian Moral Psychology

Hegel Bulletin 34 (1):33-58 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One of the reasons why there is no Hegelian school in contemporary ethics in the way that there are Kantian, Humean and Aristotelian schools is because Hegelians have been unable to clearly articulate the Hegelian alternative to those schools’ moral psychologies, i.e., to present a Hegelian model of the motivation to, perception of, and responsibility for moral action. Here it is argued that in its most basic terms Hegel's model can be understood as follows: the agent acts in a responsible and thus paradigmatic sense when she identifies as reasons those motivations which are grounded in his or her talents and support actions that are likely to develop those talents in ways suggested by his or her interests.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Self to Self.Velleman, J. David
Phenomenology of Spirit.Hegel, G. W. F.; Miller, A. V. & Findlay, J. N.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
87 ( #30,129 of 44,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #12,593 of 44,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.