Non-branching Clause

Metaphysica 11 (2):191-210 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The central claim of the Parfitian psychological approach to personal identity is that the fact about personal identity is underpinned by a non-branching psychological continuity relation. Hence, for the advocates of the Parfitian view, it is important to understand what it is for a relation to take or not take a branching form. Nonetheless, very few attempts have been made in the literature of personal identity to define the non-branching clause. This paper undertakes this task. Drawing upon a recent debate between Anthony Brueckner and Harold Noonan on the issue, I present three candidates for the non-branching clause.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YINC
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Personal Identity.Parfit, Derek
Survival and Identity.Lewis, David K.
Personal Identity.Noonan, Harold W.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
62 ( #26,994 of 38,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #27,844 of 38,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.