Structural Injustice and the Place of Attachment

Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (1):1-21 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Reflection on the historical injustice suffered by many formerly colonized groups has left us with a peculiar account of their claims to material objects. One important upshot of that account, relevant to present day justice, is that many people seem to think that members of indigenous groups have special claims to the use of particular external objects by virtue of their attachment to them. In the first part of this paper I argue against that attachment-based claim. In the second part I suggest that, to provide a normatively defensible account of why sometimes agents who are attached to certain external objects might also have special claims over them, the most important consideration is whether the agents making such claims suffer from structural injustice in the present. In the third part I try to explain why structural injustice matters, in what way attachment-based claims relate to it and when they count.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YPISIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-04

Total views
98 ( #28,102 of 43,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #29,016 of 43,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.