A Not-So-Gentle Refutation of the Defence of Homeopathy

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):21-25 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a recent paper, Levy, Gadd, Kerridge, and Komesaroff attempt to defend the ethicality of homeopathy by attacking the utilitarian ethical framework as a basis for medical ethics and by introducing a distinction between evidence-based medicine and modern science. This paper demonstrates that their argumentation is not only insufficient to achieve that goal but also incorrect. Utilitarianism is not required to show that homeopathic practice is unethical; indeed, any normative basis of medical ethics will make it unethical, as a defence of homeopathic practice requires the rejection of modern natural sciences, which are an integral part of medical ethics systems. This paper also points out that evidence-based medicine lies at the very core of modern science. Particular arguments made by Levy et al. within the principlist medical ethics normative system are also shown to be wrong
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #31,030 of 50,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #42,522 of 50,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.