A Not-So-Gentle Refutation of the Defence of Homeopathy

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):21-25 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a recent paper, Levy, Gadd, Kerridge, and Komesaroff attempt to defend the ethicality of homeopathy by attacking the utilitarian ethical framework as a basis for medical ethics and by introducing a distinction between evidence-based medicine and modern science. This paper demonstrates that their argumentation is not only insufficient to achieve that goal but also incorrect. Utilitarianism is not required to show that homeopathic practice is unethical; indeed, any normative basis of medical ethics will make it unethical, as a defence of homeopathic practice requires the rejection of modern natural sciences, which are an integral part of medical ethics systems. This paper also points out that evidence-based medicine lies at the very core of modern science. Particular arguments made by Levy et al. within the principlist medical ethics normative system are also shown to be wrong
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-01-06
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
145 ( #39,510 of 65,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #58,071 of 65,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.