The Many Uses of Predicates of Taste and the Challenge from Disagreement

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the debate between contextualism and relativism about predicates of taste, the challenge from disagreement (the objection that contextualism cannot account for disagreement in ordinary exchanges involving such predicates) has played a central role. This paper investigates one way of answering the challenge consisting on appeal to certain, less focused on, uses of predicates of taste. It argues that the said thread is unsatisfactory, in that it downplays certain exchanges that constitute the core disagreement data. Additionally, several arguments to the effect that the exchanges in question don’t amount to disagreement are considered and rejected.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZEMTMU
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Literal Meaning.Recanati, François
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Cappelen, Herman & Hawthorne, John

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-19

Total views
203 ( #20,827 of 48,970 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #20,076 of 48,970 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.