Buddhist Moral Reason: Morality or (and) Virtue

Journal of South Asian Buddhalogy Studies 1 (1):115-140 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The research method of Buddhist ethics is contemporary ethical theory, which focuses on precepts (Sila) and disciplines (Vinaya) in experience, rather than transcendental moral ideals (Nirvana or wisdom). Precepts are seen as external norms, while disciplines are internal norms. The former belongs to rule ethics and the latter belongs to virtue ethics. Although the exposition of duty and responsibility can be discovered in Buddhist ethics, there is no sufficient reason to interpret Buddhist ethics as deontology. Views on the consequences of actions can also be found in Buddhist classics, but it is hard to say that Buddhist ethics is the theory of consequences or utilitarianism. The method of rule ethics in the discussion of Buddhist ethics has failed, and Buddhist virtue ethics is a feasible alternative. However, previous research on Buddhist virtue ethics was not perfect, and the teleology of Aristotelian was reasonably criticized. Influenced by caring ethics, emotionalism virtue ethics is a more suitable way to understand Buddhist ethics. The moral reason for Buddhism is a whole argumentation system, including moral rules and moral virtues.

Author's Profile

Dawei Zhang
Zhongkai University of Agricultural and Engineering

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-08

Downloads
33 (#97,858)

6 months
33 (#96,117)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?