Comparison between Hegel’s Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching’s Yin-Yang-I (Change)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article introduces a cross-cultural comparative study on Hegel’s Western triad of Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching (including Tao-Teh-Ching, TTK)’s Eastern triad of Yin-Yang-I (Change). The study exposes the similarities and differences between the two triads in three aspects: concept, internal motivation, and external manifestation. Results include: (1) Hegel’s “Tao” is not identical to that of the Yin-Yang paradigm; (2) Hegel’s envision of Becoming is intrinsically far away from the essence of I-Ching’s I.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZHECBH
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Buddhist Consciousnesses and Psychological Forces.Ma Zhen - 2016 - Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 1 (5):1-15.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-06

Total views
430 ( #7,748 of 43,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
154 ( #2,735 of 43,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.