Comparison between Hegel’s Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching’s Yin-Yang-I (Change)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article introduces a cross-cultural comparative study on Hegel’s Western triad of Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching (including Tao-Teh-Ching, TTK)’s Eastern triad of Yin-Yang-I (Change). The study exposes the similarities and differences between the two triads in three aspects: concept, internal motivation, and external manifestation. Results include: (1) Hegel’s “Tao” is not identical to that of the Yin-Yang paradigm; (2) Hegel’s envision of Becoming is intrinsically far away from the essence of I-Ching’s I.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZHECBH
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-06

Total views
760 ( #4,986 of 53,509 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
233 ( #1,639 of 53,509 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.