Alternatywizm, dysjunktywizm i pluralizm doświadczeniowy

Studia Humanistyczne AGH 17 (1):7-19 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The claim currently known as “disjunctivism” is usually interpreted in terms of exclusive disjunction. However, it can be also explicated through the lens of alternative denial. The aim of this paper is to show that the latter interpretation is more accurate. Firstly, it reflects the core of disjunctivism more precisely. Secondly, it reduces metaphysical weight of the claim, thereby making it more plausible.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZIBADI
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-10-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-16

Total views
69 ( #42,453 of 54,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #31,889 of 54,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.