Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11):774-778 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I present an argument in favour of a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I argue that if embryos created in vitro were able to decide for themselves in a rational manner, they would sometimes choose PGD as a method of selection. Couples, therefore, should respect their hypothetical choices on a principle similar to that of patient autonomy. My thesis shows that no matter which moral doctrine couples subscribe to, they ought to conduct the PGD procedure in the situations when it is impossible to implant all of the created embryos and if there is a significant risk for giving birth to a child with a serious condition.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZURPGD
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-05-19

Total views
157 ( #20,292 of 42,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #36,240 of 42,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.