Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A theory of lexical access in speech production.Willem J. M. Levelt, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):1-38.
    Preparing words in speech production is normally a fast and accurate process. We generate them two or three per second in fluent conversation; and overtly naming a clear picture of an object can easily be initiated within 600 msec after picture onset. The underlying process, however, is exceedingly complex. The theory reviewed in this target article analyzes this process as staged and feedforward. After a first stage of conceptual preparation, word generation proceeds through lexical selection, morphological and phonological encoding, phonetic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   279 citations  
  • A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Gary S. Dell - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (3):283-321.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   252 citations  
  • Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Stephen D. Goldinger - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):251-279.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   126 citations  
  • Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.Dennis Norris - 1994 - Cognition 52 (3):189-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   82 citations  
  • Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.Gary M. Oppenheim & Gary S. Dell - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):528-537.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon.James M. McQueen, Anne Cutler & Dennis Norris - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (6):1113-1126.
    A perceptual learning experiment provides evidence that the mental lexicon cannot consist solely of detailed acoustic traces of recognition episodes. In a training lexical decision phase, listeners heard an ambiguous [f–s] fricative sound, replacing either [f] or [s] in words. In a test phase, listeners then made lexical decisions to visual targets following auditory primes. Critical materials were minimal pairs that could be a word with either [f] or [s] (cf. English knife–nice), none of which had been heard in training. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script?Noriko Hoshino & Judith F. Kroll - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):501-511.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.David B. Pisoni & Paul A. Luce - 1987 - Cognition 25 (1-2):21-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception.Christophe Pallier, Laura Bosch & Núria Sebastián-Gallés - 1997 - Cognition 64 (3):9-17.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals.Núria Sebastián-Gallés & Salvador Soto-Faraco - 1999 - Cognition 72 (2):111-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Lexical access in bilinguals.Alfonso Caramazza & Isabel Brones - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (4):212-214.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations