Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (3 other versions)Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2334 citations  
  • Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly.Norman Daniels - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book by the award-winning author of Just Healthcare, Norman Daniels develops a comprehensive theory of justice for health that answers three key questions: what is the special moral importance of health? When are health inequalities unjust? How can we meet health needs fairly when we cannot meet them all? Daniels' theory has implications for national and global health policy: can we meet health needs fairly in ageing societies? Or protect health in the workplace while respecting individual liberty? Or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   310 citations  
  • Politics as a vocation.Max Weber - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   169 citations  
  • Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers.Norman Daniels & James Sabin - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (4):303-350.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   116 citations  
  • Political legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Political legitimacy is a virtue of political institutions and of the decisions—about laws, policies, and candidates for political office—made within them. This entry will survey the main answers that have been given to the following questions. First, how should legitimacy be defined? Is it primarily a descriptive or a normative concept? If legitimacy is understood normatively, what does it entail? Some associate legitimacy with the justification of coercive power and with the creation of political authority. Others associate it with the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • (1 other version)Four Unsolved Rationing Problems A Challenge.Norman Daniels - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (4):27-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Beyond accountability for reasonableness.Alex Friedman - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (2):101–112.
    This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’ framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of becoming the dominant paradigm in the field of health policy. The framework attempts to set ground rules for a procedure that ensures that whatever decisions result will be fair, reasonable, and legitimate to the extent that even (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements.K. Baeroe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):488-496.
    What are the criteria for reasonable clinical judgements? The reasonableness of macro-level decision-making has been much discussed, but little attention has been paid to the reasonableness of applying guidelines generated at a macro-level to individual cases. This paper considers a framework for reasonable clinical decision-making that will capture cases where relevant guidelines cannot reasonably be followed. There are three main sections. (1) Individual claims on healthcare from the point of view of concerns about equity are analysed. (2) The demands of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Priority setting in health care: On the relation between reasonable choices on the micro-level and the macro-level.Kristine Bærøe - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):87-102.
    There has been much discussion about how to obtain legitimacy at macro-level priority setting in health care by use of fair procedures, but how should we consider priority setting by individual clinicians or health workers at the micro-level? Despite the fact that just health care totally hinges upon their decisions, surprisingly little attention seems being paid to the legitimacy of these decisions. This paper addresses the following question: what are the conditions that have to be met in order to ensure (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements.Kristine Bærøe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):488-496.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Public Health Ethics: Resource Allocation and the Ethics of Legitimacy.Kristine Bærøe - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 4 (1).
    Public health ethics is a relatively new academic field. Crucially, it is distinguished from traditional medical ethics by its focus on populations rather than individuals. Still, the ethics of public health cannot be perceived completely detached from the ethics of individuals, as populations are made up of individuals. One issue that clearly falls within the intersection of a population- and an individual based perspective on ethics is resource allocation. Resource allocation takes place at various stages within the organisation of healthcare, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation