Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Notes on Cardinals That Are Characterizable by a Complete (Scott) Sentence.Ioannis Souldatos - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):533-551.
    This is the first part of a study on cardinals that are characterizable by Scott sentences. Building on previous work of Hjorth, Malitz, and Baumgartner, we study which cardinals are characterizable by a Scott sentence $\phi$, in the sense that $\phi$ characterizes $\kappa$, if $\phi$ has a model of size $\kappa$ but no models of size $\kappa^{+}$. We show that the set of cardinals that are characterized by a Scott sentence is closed under successors, countable unions, and countable products. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Linear orderings and powers of characterizable cardinals.Ioannis Souldatos - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (3):225-237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the existence of atomic models.M. C. Laskowski & S. Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1189-1194.
    We give an example of a countable theory $T$ such that for every cardinal $\lambda \geq \aleph_2$ there is a fully indiscernible set $A$ of power $\lambda$ such that the principal types are dense over $A$, yet there is no atomic model of $T$ over $A$. In particular, $T$ is a theory of size $\lambda$ where the principal types are dense, yet $T$ has no atomic model.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • A complete L ω1ω-sentence characterizing ℵ1.Julia F. Knight - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (1):59-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Knight's model, its automorphism group, and characterizing the uncountable cardinals.Greg Hjorth - 2002 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 2 (01):113-144.
    We show that every ℵα can be characterized by the Scott sentence of some countable model; moreover there is a countable structure whose Scott sentence characterizes ℵ1 but whose automorphism group fails the topological Vaught conjecture on analytic sets. We obtain some partial information on Ulm type dichotomy theorems for the automorphism group of Knight's model.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The joint embedding property and maximal models.John T. Baldwin, Martin Koerwien & Ioannis Souldatos - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (3-4):545-565.
    We introduce the notion of a ‘pure’ Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem : If ⟨λi:i≤α<ℵ1⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\langle \lambda _i: i\le \alpha <\aleph _1\rangle $$\end{document} is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals whose models satisfy JEP\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$$$\end{document}, there is an Lω1,ω\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_{\omega _1,\omega }$$\end{document}-sentence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Hanf number for complete lω1, ω-sentences (without GCH).James E. Baumgartner - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):575 - 578.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Disjoint amalgamation in locally finite aec.John T. Baldwin, Martin Koerwien & Michael C. Laskowski - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (1):98-119.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations