Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Justice, sexual harassment, and the reasonable victim standard.Deborah L. Wells & Beverly J. Kracher - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):423 - 431.
    In determining when sexual behavior in the workplace creates a hostile working environment, some courts have asked, Would a reasonableperson view this as a hostile environment? Two recent court decisions, recognizing male-female differences in the perception of social sexual behavior at work, modified this standard to ask, Would a reasonablevictim view this as a hostile environment? As yet, there is no consensus in the legal community regarding which of these standards is just.We propose that moral theory provides the framework from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Gender equity, organizational transformation and Challenger.Mark Maier - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):943-962.
    The concept of the "unlevel playing field" is critiqued for its tendency to take the prevailing masculinist managerial paradigm for granted. Rather than assume that both men and women should assimilate to corporate masculinity, feminist alternatives are suggested. The pervasiveness of the masculine ethic and the "myth of meritocracy" in organizations are reviewed, with the space shuttle Challenger disaster serving as a focal point to demonstrate the dysfunctionality of masculine management and the rationale for feminist-based organizational transformation to promote not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.Carol Gilligan - 1982 - The Personalist Forum 2 (2):150-152.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2031 citations  
  • The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment.James E. Gruber - 1998 - Gender and Society 12 (3):301-320.
    Women's experiences with sexual harassment were analyzed with three types of variables: occupational and workplace sex ratios, organizational policies and procedures for dealing with sexual harassment problems, and women's cultural status. Regression analyses revealed that extent of contact with men was a key predictor of incidence of harassment, number of different types of harrassment, sexual comments, sexual categorical remarks, and sexual materials. Gender predominance was a significant predictor of physical threats and sexual materials. Informational methods were less successful than proactive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations