Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Rumor, Gossip and Urban Legends.Nicholas DiFonzo & Prashant Bordia - 2007 - Diogenes 54 (1):19-35.
    The term ‘rumor’ is often used interchangeably with ‘gossip’ and ‘urban legend’ by both laypersons and scholars. In this article we attempt to clarify the construct of rumor by proposing a definition that delineates the situational and motivational contexts from which rumors arise (ambiguous, threatening or potentially threatening situations), the functions that rumors perform (sense-making and threat management), and the contents of rumor statements (unverified and instrumentally relevant information statements in circulation). To further clarify the rumor construct we also investigate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Editor's Introduction to Society and Animals.Kenneth J. Shapiro - 1993 - Society and Animals 1 (1):1-4.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • ‘Not the Wolf Itself’: Distinguishing Hunters’ Criticisms of Wolves from Procedures for Making Wolf Management Decisions.Erica von Essen & Michael Allen - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (1):97-113.
    Swedish hunters sometimes appeal to an inviolate ‘right to exist’ for wolves, apparently rejecting NIMBY. Nevertheless, the conditions existence hunters impose on wolves in practice fundamentally contradict their use of right to exist language. Hunters appeal to this language hoping to gain uptake in a conservation and management discourse demanding appropriately objective ecological language. However, their contradictory use of ‘right to exist' opens them up to the charge that they are being deceptive – indeed, right to exist is a 'disguised (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • NIMBY Claims, Free Riders and Universalisability.G. K. D. Crozier & Christopher Hajzler - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (3):317-320.
    In ‘Why not NIMBY?’, Simon Feldman and Derek Turner mount a compelling case that NIMBY claims are not intrinsically morally unjustified, despite the fact that NIMBY-claimants...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations