Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Stop Thinking So Much About ‘Sexual Harassment’.Jennifer Saul - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3):307-321.
    This article explores two related widespread mistakes in thinking about sexual harassment. One is a mistake made by philosophers doing philosophical work on the topic of sexual harassment: an excessive focus on attempting to define the term ‘sexual harassment’. This is a perfectly legitimate topic for discussion and indeed a necessary one, but its dominance of the literature has tended to prevent philosophers from adequately exploring other topics that are of at least equal importance, particularly that of bystanders' responsibilities. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Weinstein, sexual predation, and ‘Rape Culture’: Public pedagogies and Hashtag Internet activism.Michael A. Peters & Tina Besley - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (5):458-464.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Named or nameless: University ethics, confidentiality and sexual harassment.Michael A. Peters, Liz Jackson & Tina Besley - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (14):2422-2433.
    This paper focusses on our concerns about revelations about sexual harassment in universities and the inadequate responses whereby some universities seem more concerned about their own reputations than the care and protection of their students. Seldom do cases go to criminal court, instead they mostly fall within employment relations policies where the use of non-disclosure agreements are double edged, such that some perpetrators remain nameless even if the person offended against wants details made public. Of course if the staff member (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces.Liz Jackson - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-9.
    Conference environments enable diverse roles for academics. However, conferences are hardly entered into by participants as equals. Academics enter into and experience professional environments differently according to culture, gender, race, ethnicity, class, and more. This paper considers from a philosophical perspective entering and initiating culturally into academic conferences as a woman. It discusses theories of gender and emotional labor and emotional management, focusing on Arlie Hochschild’s foundational work, and affect in gendered social relations, considering Sara Ahmed’s theorization of the feminist (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces.Liz Jackson - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (7):693-701.
    Conference environments enable diverse roles for academics. However, conferences are hardly entered into by participants as equals. Academics enter into and experience professional environments differently according to culture, gender, race, ethnicity, class, and more. This paper considers from a philosophical perspective entering and initiating culturally into academic conferences as a woman. It discusses theories of gender and emotional labor and emotional management, focusing on Arlie Hochschild’s foundational work, and affect in gendered social relations, considering Sara Ahmed’s theorization of the feminist (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Reaction Is Not Enough: Decreasing Gendered Harassment in Academic Contexts in Chile, Hong Kong, and the United States.Liz Jackson & Ana Luisa Muñoz‐García - 2019 - Educational Theory 69 (1):17-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom?Miranda Fricker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1317-1332.
    I shall first briefly revisit the broad idea of ‘epistemic injustice’, explaining how it can take either distributive or discriminatory form, in order to put the concepts of ‘testimonial injustice’ and ‘hermeneutical injustice’ in place. In previous work I have explored how the wrong of both kinds of epistemic injustice has both an ethical and an epistemic significance—someone is wronged in their capacity as a knower. But my present aim is to show that this wrong can also have a political (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations