Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
    The most widely debated conception of democracy in recent years is deliberative democracy--the idea that citizens or their representatives owe each other mutually acceptable reasons for the laws they enact. Two prominent voices in the ongoing discussion are Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. In Why Deliberative Democracy?, they move the debate forward beyond their influential book, Democracy and Disagreement.What exactly is deliberative democracy? Why is it more defensible than its rivals? By offering clear answers to these timely questions, Gutmann and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   331 citations  
  • Review of Juergen Habermas: The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, 'Reason and the Rationalization of Society'[REVIEW]Steven B. Smith - 1986 - Ethics 96 (3):638-641.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Questions of Criticism.Samantha Ashenden - 1999 - In Samantha Ashenden & David Owen (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory. London: SAGE. pp. 143.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The "paradox" of knowledge and power: Reading Foucault on a bias.Tom Keenan - 1987 - Political Theory 15 (1):5-37.
    What if thought freed itself from common sense and decided to think only at the extreme point of its singularity? What if it mischievously practiced the bias of paradox, instead of complacently accepting its citizenship in the doxa? What if it thought difference differentially, instead of searching out the common elements underlying difference?1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   804 citations  
  • Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2001 - Political Theory 29 (5):670-690.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  • Normalising democracy: Foucault and Habermas on democracy.Mitchell Dean - 1999 - In Samantha Ashenden & David Owen (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory. London: SAGE. pp. 166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society.Nanette Funk, Jurgen Habermas & Thomas McCarthy - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):269.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   109 citations  
  • Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations (G. Brock).John S. Dryzek - 2000 - Philosophical Books 43 (2):165-166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   170 citations  
  • Habermas, Foucault and Nietzsche: A Double Misunderstanding.Thomas Biebricher - 2005 - Foucault Studies 3:1-26.
    The article analyses Habermas' interpretation of Foucault in the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity and argues that the former misunderstands the Foucaultian project of genealogy fundamentally. While Habermas assumes that Foucault aims at a strictly scientific approach to the writing of history it can be shown that Foucaultian genealogy is strongly characterised by rhetorical aspects, creating a hybrid model of critique that stands in between science and literature. The essay goes on arguing that this misreading can be explained with reference to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • I. The "Paradox" of Knowledge and Power: Reading Foucault on a Bias.Tom Keenan - 1987 - Political Theory 15 (1):5-37.
    What if thought freed itself from common sense and decided to think only at the extreme point of its singularity? What if it mischievously practiced the bias of paradox, instead of complacently accepting its citizenship in the doxa? What if it thought difference differentially, instead of searching out the common elements underlying difference?1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Critical Theory. [REVIEW]Alasdair MacIntyre - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):485-487.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Foucault and the Political.Jon Simons - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 58 (3):593-594.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Critical Theory.David Couzens Hoy & Thomas Mccarthy - 1996 - Ethics 106 (3):657-659.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations