Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Review of Jon Elster: Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens.[REVIEW]Jon Elster - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):459-461.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Local justice and interpersonal comparisons.Jon Elster - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of well-being. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 98--126.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • (1 other version)Interpersonal comparisons of well-being.Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.) - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    In this volume a diverse group of economists, philosophers, political scientists, and psychologists address the problems, principles, and practices involved in comparing the well-being of different individuals. A series of questions lie at the heart of this investigation: What is the relevant concept of well-being for the purposes of comparison? How could the comparisons be carried out for policy purposes? How are such comparisons made now? How do the difficulties involved in these comparisons affect the status of utilitarian theories? This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Inequality Reexamined.Amartya Sen - 1927 - Oxford University Press UK.
    This book develops some of the most important themes of Sen's works over the last decade. He argues in a rich and subtle approach that we should be concerned with people's capabilities rather than their resources or welfare.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   258 citations  
  • Inequality Reexamined.John Roemer & Amartya Sen - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):554.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   300 citations  
  • (1 other version)Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being.Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.) - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    In this volume a diverse group of economists, philosophers, political scientists, and psychologists address the problems, principles, and practices involved in comparing the well-being of different individuals. A series of questions lie at the heart of this investigation: What is the relevant concept of well-being for the purposes of comparison? How could the comparisons be carried out for policy purposes? How are such comparisons made now? How do the difficulties involved in these comparisons affect the status of utilitarian theories? This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • .James Buchan - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations