Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Countable structures of given age.H. D. Macpherson, M. Pouzet & R. E. Woodrow - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):992-1010.
    Let L be a finite relational language. The age of a structure M over L is the set of isomorphism types of finite substructures of M. We classify those ages U for which there are less than 2ω countably infinite pairwise nonisomorphic L-structures of age U.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Stable structures with few substructures.Michael C. Laskowski & Laura L. Mayer - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (3):985-1005.
    A countable, atomically stable structure U in a finite, relational language has fewer than 2 ω non-isomorphic substructures if and only if U is cellular. An example shows that the finiteness of the language is necessary.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Coinductive $aleph_0$-Categorical Theories.James H. Schmerl - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1130-1137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Coinductive ℵ0-categorical theories.James H. Schmerl - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1130 - 1137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The elementary diagram of a trivial, weakly minimal structure is near model complete.Michael C. Laskowski - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (1):15-24.
    We prove that if M is any model of a trivial, weakly minimal theory, then the elementary diagram T(M) eliminates quantifiers down to Boolean combinations of certain existential formulas.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Counting Siblings in Universal Theories.Samuel Braunfeld & Michael C. Laskowski - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1130-1155.
    We show that if a countable structure M in a finite relational language is not cellular, then there is an age-preserving $N \supseteq M$ such that $2^{\aleph _0}$ many structures are bi-embeddable with N. The proof proceeds by a case division based on mutual algebraicity.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Mutually algebraic structures and expansions by predicates.Michael C. Laskowski - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (1):185-194.
    We introduce the notions of a mutually algebraic structures and theories and prove many equivalents. A theory $T$ is mutually algebraic if and only if it is weakly minimal and trivial if and only if no model $M$ of $T$ has an expansion $(M,A)$ by a unary predicate with the finite cover property. We show that every structure has a maximal mutually algebraic reduct, and give a strong structure theorem for the class of elementary extensions of a fixed mutually algebraic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Uniformly Bounded Arrays and Mutually Algebraic Structures.Michael C. Laskowski & Caroline A. Terry - 2020 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61 (2):265-282.
    We define an easily verifiable notion of an atomic formula having uniformly bounded arrays in a structure M. We prove that if T is a complete L-theory, then T is mutually algebraic if and only if there is some model M of T for which every atomic formula has uniformly bounded arrays. Moreover, an incomplete theory T is mutually algebraic if and only if every atomic formula has uniformly bounded arrays in every model M of T.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations