Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Why has autonomy been a leading idea in philosophical writing on bioethics, and why has trust been marginal? In this important book, Onora O'Neill suggests that the conceptions of individual autonomy so widely relied on in bioethics are philosophically and ethically inadequate, and that they undermine rather than support relations of trust. She shows how Kant's non-individualistic view of autonomy provides a stronger basis for an approach to medicine, science and biotechnology, and does not marginalize untrustworthiness, while also explaining why (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   267 citations  
  • Trust and Altruism--Organ Distribution Scandals: Do They Provide Good Reasons to Refuse Posthumous Donation?A. Dufner & J. Harris - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (3):328-341.
    A recent organ distribution scandal in Germany raises questions of general importance on which many thousands of lives may well depend. The scandal in Germany has produced reactions that are likely to occur whenever and wherever distribution irregularities occur and become public knowledge. After it had become known that physicians in three German hospitals were in the habit of manipulating records in order to fast-track their patients’ cases, the country experienced a decrease of available organs by a staggering 40% in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Medicine, Patients and the Law.Margaret Brazier & Emma Cave - 1992 (MB), 2011 - Penguin Books.
    Embryo research, cloning, assisted conception, neonatal care, savior siblings, organ transplants, drug trials – modern developments have transformed the field of medicine almost beyond recognition in recent decades and the law struggles to keep up. At the same time legal claims against doctors and the NHS has grown and doctors feel under siege. In this highly acclaimed and very accessible book, Margaret Brazier and Emma Cave provide an incisive survey of the legal situation in areas as diverse as fertility treatment, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Trust and the Duty of Organ Donation.Ben Almassi - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):275-283.
    Several recent publications in biomedical ethics argue that organ donation is generally morally obligatory and failure to do so is morally indefensible. Arguments for this moral conclusion tend to be of two kinds: arguments from fairness and arguments from easy rescue. While I agree that many of us have a duty to donate, in this article I criticize these arguments for a general duty of organ donation and their application to organ procurement policy. My concern is that these arguments neglect (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Why Value Autonomy?Thomas Hurka - 1987 - Social Theory and Practice 13 (3):361-382.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • The value of autonomy.Robert Young - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (126):35-44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   613 citations  
  • Trust and Power.Niklas Luhmann - 1982 - Studies in Soviet Thought 23 (3):266-270.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   167 citations  
  • The ethics of elective (non-therapeutic) ventilation.Alister Browne, Grant Gillet & Martin Tweeddale - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (1):42–57.
    Elective ventilation (EV) is ventilation applied, not in the interest of patients, but in order to secure transplantable organs. It carries with it a small risk that patients who would otherwise have died will survive in a persistent vegetative state. Is EV ever justifiable? We argue: (1) The only thing which can justify exposing patients to risk not taken for their benefit is their consent, and we cannot rely on implied consent or third party consent in the case of EV. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures.Sarah-Jane Brown - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (4):122-129.
    Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures before death, and there are a number of difficulties in encompassing these procedures within the Mental Capacity Act 2005 provisions on best interests. This article proposes a system of specific advance consent to enable best interests to take on its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Gerechtigkeit, Vertrauen und Zurechenbarkeit.Onora O’Neill - 2005 - In Otto Neumaier (ed.), Gerechtigkeit: Auf der Suche nach einem Gleichgewicht. De Gruyter. pp. 33-56.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Optimizing donor potential in the UK.Paul G. Murphy - 2011 - Clinical Ethics 6 (3):127-133.
    Rates of deceased organ donation in the UK fall well short of those reported from other parts of the world, and result in unnecessary deaths and avoidable morbidity. A particular feature of the UK problem is that its total potential for donation is lower than the actual number of donors reported in the highest-donating countries. This implies that while the identification, referral and conversion of recognized potential deceased donors is an important component of any strategic effort to increase donation, more (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation