Switch to: Citations

References in:

Reply to Rabinowicz

Philosophical Issues 19 (1):412-417 (2009)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Broome's argument against value incomparability.Erik Carlson - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (2):220-224.
    John Broome has argued that alleged cases of value incomparability are really examples of vagueness in the betterness relation. The main premiss of his argument is ‘the collapsing principle’. I argue that this principle is dubious, and that Broome's argument is therefore unconvincing. Correspondence:c1 [email protected].
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations