Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The ontological status of theoretical entities.Grover Maxwell - 1962 - In Herbert Feigl & Grover Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 181-192.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   136 citations  
  • An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In James Schmidt (ed.), What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. University of California Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   194 citations  
  • Anti-Latour.David Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   111 citations  
  • Darwinism and Developmental Systems.Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray - 2001 - In Susan Oyama, Paul Griffiths & Russell D. Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. MIT Press. pp. 195-218.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences.Ian Hacking - 1992 - In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 29--64.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   158 citations  
  • Postmodern? No, Simply A m odern! Steps Towards an Anthropology of Science.Bruno Latour - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (1):145-171.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Can We Get Our Materialism Back, Please?Bruno Latour - 2007 - Isis 98 (1):138-142.
    Technology is epistemology’s poor relative. It still carries the baggage of a definition of matter handed down to it by another odd definition of scientific activity. The consequence is that many descriptions of “things” have nothing “thingly” about them. They are simply “objects” mistaken for things. Hence the necessity of a new descriptive style that circumvents the limits of the materialist definition of material existence. This is what has been achieved in the group of essays on “Thick Things” for which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations