Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Logical reasoning and domain specificity: A critique of the social exchange theory of reasoning.Paul Sheldon Davies, James H. Fetzer & Thomas R. Foster - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):1-37.
    The social exchange theory of reasoning, which is championed by Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, falls under the general rubric “evolutionary psychology” and asserts that human reasoning is governed by content-dependent, domain-specific, evolutionarily-derived algorithms. According to Cosmides and Tooby, the presumptive existence of what they call “cheater-detection” algorithms disconfirms the claim that we reason via general-purpose mechanisms or via inductively acquired principles. We contend that the Cosmides/Tooby arguments in favor of domain-specific algorithms or evolutionarily-derived mechanisms fail and that the notion (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Leda Cosmides - 1989 - Cognition 31 (3):187-276.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   504 citations  
  • On the natural selection of reasoning theories.Patricia W. Cheng & Keith J. Holyoak - 1989 - Cognition 33 (3):285-313.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   79 citations  
  • A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning.Keith Stenning & Michiel Lambalgen - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):481-529.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Relevance theory explains the selection task.D. Sperber - 1995 - Cognition 57 (1):31-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  • Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.Gerd Gigerenzer & Klaus Hug - 1992 - Cognition 43 (2):127-171.
    What counts as human rationality: reasoning processes that embody content-independent formal theories, such as propositional logic, or reasoning processes that are well designed for solving important adaptive problems? Most theories of human reasoning have been based on content-independent formal rationality, whereas adaptive reasoning, ecological or evolutionary, has been little explored. We elaborate and test an evolutionary approach, Cosmides' social contract theory, using the Wason selection task. In the first part, we disentangle the theoretical concept of a “social contract” from that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   199 citations  
  • No interpretation without representation: the role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task.Laurence Fiddick, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby - 2000 - Cognition 77 (1):1-79.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • On conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   454 citations  
  • From massive modularity to metarepresentation: The evolution of higher cognition.David E. Over - 2003 - In Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate. Psychology Press. pp. 121--144.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations