(2013). ‘The Pope and Prince of All the Metaphysicians’: Some Recent Works on Suárez. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 393-403. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2013.771251.

This work, the text of Martin Heidegger's lecture course of 1929/30, is crucial for an understanding of Heidegger's transition from the major work of his early years, Being and Time, to his later preoccupations with language, truth, and ...

This is a new revised version of Dr. Laslett's standard edition of Two Treatises. First published in 1960, and based on an analysis of the whole body of Locke's publications, writings, and papers. The Introduction and text have been revised to incorporate references to recent scholarship since the second edition and the bibliography has been updated.

In fact, it requires two major social institutions--morality and government--working in a coordinated fashion to do so. This is one of the main themes of Hobbes's philosophy that will be developed in this book.

1. The classical mind.--2. The medieval mind.--3. Hobbes to Hume.--4. Kant to Wittgenstein and Sartre.

During the seventeenth century Francisco Surez was considered one of the greatest philosophers of the age: he is now reemerging as a major subject of critical and historical investigation. A leading team of scholars explore his work on ethics, metaphysics, ontology, and theology. This will be the starting-point for future research on Surez.

This dissertation deals with one of the most subtle and comprehensive philosophical accounts regarding the nature and operations of the human will; that developed Francisco Suarez during the pre-cartesian period. ;Suarez did offer a subtle account of will both with regard to the articulation of the issue and the conception of will itself. Suarez, unlike his predecessors, structures his views on will in texts on metaphysics and psychology; only the issues about the freedom of the will are treated in his (...) theology. ;Suarez's articulation of the topic allows scholars to clearly distinguish between the meta-psychological issues about the will and the typical theological concerns that Scholastics attached to will. ;We observe that contemporary philosophical tendencies demand not a division but some sort of unification for the topic. So we reconstructed analytically in a unified manner Suarez's metaphysical, psychological and theological accounts of will. The elements included in each account are still gathered together by two grounding questions: what is the will? and how does it function? ;We base our reconstruction directly on Suarez's own subtle conception of will itself. He holds a two-fold yet integrated conception of will, for he offers a metaphysical account and a psychological account. The reason is that for Suarez the will plays two roles: one related to the proximate efficient principle that will is--as such, it efficaciously produces the most perfect human act, the free-act; the other role related to the will's nature as a vital appetitive faculty of the soul--as such it is willing for unpossessed goods. ;To grasp the vital nature of will, we provide the preliminary framework of Suarez's philosophical general psychology. Our main source of analysis and discussions is Suarez's treatise De Anima , which--to my knowledge--has never been discussed extensively in any published philosophical paper. ;We stress that Suarez's meta-psychological writings on soul and will constitute his initial settings for his theology of will and freedom. It is only with this fundamental framework that we could assess Suarez's paradigmatic indeterministic view on freedom and associated issue of reconciliation. (shrink)