Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Paradoxes of democratic accountability: Polarized parties, hard decisions, and no despot to Veto.Michael H. Murakami - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (1-2):91-113.
    Parties are back, and many are cheering. Party polarization has voters seeing stark differences between Democrats and Republicans and demonstrating more ideological constraint than previous generations. But these signs of a more “responsible” electorate are an illusion, because the public is no more knowledgeable than ever about the type of “information” it needs if it is to exercise effective control over the public‐policy outcomes it cares the most about. Indeed, polarization has produced a political environment where both voters and policy (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Review of Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion.Dale E. Miller - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   200 citations  
  • The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion.Jonathan Haidt - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   562 citations  
  • Reflections on Biased Assimilation and Belief Polarization.Lee Ross - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (2):233-245.
    Where Taber and Lodge view belief polarization to indicate a “partisan motivation,” Lord et al. (1979) believed it to be consistent with a desire for accuracy: A “weak” study articulating an opposing viewpoint might simply sharpen participants' initial belief of the wisdom of their prior beliefs. This polarization, Taber and Lodge show, correlates with political sophistication: The more partisan a participant, the more time spent reading the opinions of the other side—in order to critically refute them. Taber and Lodge attribute (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Lay epistemo-logic—process and contents: Another look at attribution theory.Arie W. Kruglanski - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (1):70-87.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations