Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Transhumanism as a secularist faith.Hava Tirosh-Samuelson - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):710-734.
    In the second half of the twentieth century, humanism— namely, the worldview that underpinned Western thought for several centuries—has been severely critiqued by philosophers who highlighted its theoretical and ethical limitations. Inspired by the emergence of cybernetics and new technologies such as robotics, prosthetics, communications, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology, there has been a desire to articulate a new worldview that will fit the posthuman condition. Posthumanism is a description of a new form of human existence in which the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The simulation argument.Nick Bostrom - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):28-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Teilhard de Chardin and Transhumanism.Eric Steinhart - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 20 (1):1-22.
    Teilhard is among the first to seriously explore the future of human evolution. He advocates both bio-technologies (e.g. genetic engineering) and intelligence technologies. He discusses the emergence of a global computation - communication system (and is said by some to have been the first to have envisioned the Internet). He advocates the development of a global society. He is almost surely the first to discuss the acceleration of technological progress to a Singularity in which human intelligence will become super-intelligence. He (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The physics of information processing superobjects: daily life among the Jupiter brains.Anders Sandberg - 1999 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 5 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • What is transhumanism?Nick Bostrom - manuscript
    Over the past few years, a new paradigm for thinking about humankind's future has begun to take shape among some leading computer scientists, neuroscientists, nanotechnologists and researchers at the forefront of technological development. The new paradigm rejects a crucial assumption that is implicit in both traditional futurology and practically all of today's political thinking. This is the assumption that the "human condition" is at root a constant. Present-day processes can be fine-tuned; wealth can be increased and redistributed; tools can be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations