Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life.Andrew Sayer - 2011 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Andrew Sayer undertakes a fundamental critique of social science's difficulties in acknowledging that people's relation to the world is one of concern. As sentient beings, capable of flourishing and suffering, and particularly vulnerable to how others treat us, our view of the world is substantially evaluative. Yet modernist ways of thinking encourage the common but extraordinary belief that values are beyond reason, and merely subjective or matters of convention, with little or nothing to do with the kind of beings people (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • (1 other version)How to Relate the Empirical to the Normative - Toward a Phenomenologically Informed Hermeneutic Approach to Bioethics.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Rouven Porz & Jackie Scully - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (4):436-447.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.Donna Haraway - 1988 - Feminist Studies 14 (3):575-599.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   789 citations  
  • A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.Rachel Davies, Jonathan Ives & Michael Dunn - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):15.
    Despite the increased prevalence of bioethics research that seeks to use empirical data to answer normative research questions, there is no consensus as to what an appropriate methodology for this would be. This review aims to search the literature, present and critically discuss published Empirical Bioethics methodologies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus.Jonathan Ives, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann, Kristine Bærøe, Lucy Frith, Richard Huxtable, Elleke Landeweer, Marcel Mertz, Veerle Provoost, Annette Rid, Sabine Salloch, Mark Sheehan, Daniel Strech, Martine de Vries & Guy Widdershoven - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):68.
    This paper responds to the commentaries from Stacy Carter and Alan Cribb. We pick up on two main themes in our response. First, we reflect on how the process of setting standards for empirical bioethics research entails drawing boundaries around what research counts as empirical bioethics research, and we discuss whether the standards agreed in the consensus process draw these boundaries correctly. Second, we expand on the discussion in the original paper of the role and significance of the concept of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • (1 other version)How to Relate the Empirical to the Normative.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Rouven Porz & Jackie Leach Scully - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (4):436-447.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations