Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. How the Neuroscience of Decision Making Informs Our Conception of Autonomy.Gidon Felsen & Peter B. Reiner - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (3):3-14.
    Autonomy, the ability to make decisions for ourselves about ourselves, is among the most prized of human liberties. In this review we reconsider the key conditions necessary for autonomous decision making, long debated by moral philosophers and ethicists, in light of current neuroscientific evidence. The most widely accepted criteria for autonomy are that decisions are made by a rationally deliberative and reflective agent and that these decisions are free of undue external influences. The corpus of neuroscientific data suggest that human (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower.Janet Metcalfe & Walter Mischel - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (1):3-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   127 citations  
  • The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
    Distinctions have been proposed between systems of reasoning for centuries. This article distills properties shared by many of these distinctions and characterizes the resulting systems in light of recent findings and theoretical developments. One system is associative because its computations reflect similarity structure and relations of temporal contiguity. The other is "rule based" because it operates on symbolic structures that have logical content and variables and because its computations have the properties that are normally assigned to rules. The systems serve (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   466 citations  
  • Seeking Better Health Care Outcomes: The Ethics of Using the “Nudge”.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):1-10.
    Policymakers, employers, insurance companies, researchers, and health care providers have developed an increasing interest in using principles from behavioral economics and psychology to persuade people to change their health-related behaviors, lifestyles, and habits. In this article, we examine how principles from behavioral economics and psychology are being used to nudge people (the public, patients, or health care providers) toward particular decisions or behaviors related to health or health care, and we identify the ethically relevant dimensions that should be considered for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Shifting the Focus of Rationing Discussions.Meredith Stark - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):20 - 22.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 7, Page 20-22, July 2011.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10):454-459.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   175 citations