Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Friendship and Animals: A Reply to Frööding and Peterson.Mark Rowlands - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):70-79.
    This article examines and critiques Frööding and Peterson’s account of friendship developed in their article “Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.” I argue that their central claim—that mutual benefit provides a suitable basis for friendship between human and nonhumans—is untenable, and I identify the general contours of a more satisfactory way of thinking about friendship between humans and nonhumans.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (3 other versions)The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   614 citations  
  • Why Friends Shouldn’t Let Friends Be Eaten.Jeff Jordan - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (2):309-322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.Barbro Frööding & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):58-69.
    This article discusses some aspects of animal ethics from an Aristotelian virtue ethics point of view. Because the notion of friendship (philia) is central to Aristotle’s ethical theory, the focus of the article is whether humans and animals can be friends. It is argued that new empirical findings in cognitive ethology indicate that animals actually do fulfill the Aristotelian condition for friendship based on mutual advantage. The practical ethical implications of these findings are discussed, and it is argued that eating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations