Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal.Moti Gitik & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (1):35-42.
    A model in which strongness ofκ is indestructible under κ+ -weakly closed forcing notions satisfying the Prikry condition is constructed. This is applied to solve a question of Hajnal on the number of elements of {λ δ |2 δ <λ}.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Indestructible Strong Unfoldability.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):291-321.
    Using the lottery preparation, we prove that any strongly unfoldable cardinal $\kappa$ can be made indestructible by all.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • (1 other version)Proper forcing and remarkable cardinals.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):176-184.
    The present paper investigates the power of proper forcings to change the shape of the universe, in a certain well-defined respect. It turns out that the ranking among large cardinals can be used as a measure for that power. However, in order to establish the final result I had to isolate a new large cardinal concept, which I dubbed “remarkability.” Let us approach the exact formulation of the problem—and of its solution—at a slow pace.Breathtaking developments in the mid 1980s found (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Proper forcing and remarkable cardinals II.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1481-1492.
    The current paper proves the results announced in [5]. We isolate a new large cardinal concept, "remarkability." Consistencywise, remarkable cardinals are between ineffable and ω-Erdos cardinals. They are characterized by the existence of "O # -like" embeddings; however, they relativize down to L. It turns out that the existence of a remarkable cardinal is equiconsistent with L(R) absoluteness for proper forcings. In particular, said absoluteness does not imply Π 1 1 determinacy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Ramsey-like cardinals II.Victoria Gitman & P. D. Welch - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):541-560.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Large cardinals need not be large in HOD.Yong Cheng, Sy-David Friedman & Joel David Hamkins - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1186-1198.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Diamond (on the regulars) can fail at any strongly unfoldable cardinal.Mirna Džamonja & Joel David Hamkins - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):83-95.
    If κ is any strongly unfoldable cardinal, then this is preserved in a forcing extension in which κ fails. This result continues the progression of the corresponding results for weakly compact cardinals, due to Woodin, and for indescribable cardinals, due to Hauser.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The wholeness axiom and Laver sequences.Paul Corazza - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 105 (1-3):157-260.
    In this paper we introduce the Wholeness Axiom , which asserts that there is a nontrivial elementary embedding from V to itself. We formalize the axiom in the language {∈, j } , adding to the usual axioms of ZFC all instances of Separation, but no instance of Replacement, for j -formulas, as well as axioms that ensure that j is a nontrivial elementary embedding from the universe to itself. We show that WA has consistency strength strictly between I 3 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations