Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Induction, minimization and collection for Δ n+1 (T)–formulas.A. Fernández-Margarit & F. F. Lara-Martín - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (4):505-541.
    For a theory T, we study relationships among IΔ n +1 (T), LΔ n+1 (T) and B * Δ n+1 (T). These theories are obtained restricting the schemes of induction, minimization and (a version of) collection to Δ n+1 (T) formulas. We obtain conditions on T (T is an extension of B * Δ n+1 (T) or Δ n+1 (T) is closed (in T) under bounded quantification) under which IΔ n+1 (T) and LΔ n+1 (T) are equivalent. These conditions depend (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas.A. J. Wilkie & J. B. Paris - 1987 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 35 (C):261-302.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • (1 other version)Some Results on LΔ — n+1.Alejandro Fernández Margarit & F. Félix Lara Martin - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):503-512.
    We study the quantifier complexity and the relative strength of some fragments of arithmetic axiomatized by induction and minimization schemes for Δn+1 formulas.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Induction rules, reflection principles, and provably recursive functions.Lev D. Beklemishev - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 85 (3):193-242.
    A well-known result states that, over basic Kalmar elementary arithmetic EA, the induction schema for ∑n formulas is equivalent to the uniform reflection principle for ∑n + 1 formulas . We show that fragments of arithmetic axiomatized by various forms of induction rules admit a precise axiomatization in terms of reflection principles as well. Thus, the closure of EA under the induction rule for ∑n formulas is equivalent to ω times iterated ∑n reflection principle. Moreover, for k < ω, k (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • On the induction schema for decidable predicates.Lev D. Beklemishev - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):17-34.
    We study the fragment of Peano arithmetic formalizing the induction principle for the class of decidable predicates, $I\Delta_1$ . We show that $I\Delta_1$ is independent from the set of all true arithmetical $\Pi_2-sentences$ . Moreover, we establish the connections between this theory and some classes of oracle computable functions with restrictions on the allowed number of queries. We also obtain some conservation and independence results for parameter free and inference rule forms of $\Delta_1-induction$ . An open problem formulated by J. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • On Σ1‐definable Functions Provably Total in I ∏ 1−.Teresa Bigorajska - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (1):135-137.
    We prove the following theorem: Let φ be a formula in the language of the theory PA− of discretely ordered commutative rings with unit of the form ∃yφ′ with φ′ and let ∈ Δ0 and let fφ: ℕ → ℕ such that fφ = y iff φ′ & < xK). Here I ∏math image1− denotes the theory PA− plus the scheme of induction for formulas φ of the form ∀yφ′ with φ′ ∈ Δ0.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The optimality of induction as an axiomatization of arithmetic.Daniel Leivant - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):182-184.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • (1 other version)Some Results on LΔmath image.Alejandro Fernández-Margarit & F. Félix Lara Martin - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):503-512.
    We study the quantifier complexity and the relative strength of some fragments of arithmetic axiomatized by induction and minimization schemes for Δn+1 formulas.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation