Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On militant democracy’s institutional conservatism.Patrick Nitzschner - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
    This article critically reconstructs militant democracy’s ‘institutional conservatism’, a theoretical preference for institutions that restrain transformation. It offers two arguments, one historical and one normative. Firstly, it traces a historical development from a substantive to a procedural version of institutional conservatism from the traditional militant democratic thought of Schmitt, Loewenstein and Popper to the contemporary militant democratic theories of Kirshner and Rijpkema. Substantive institutional conservatisms theorize institutions that hinder transformation of the existing order; procedural conservatisms encourage transformation but contain and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Liberalism, legal revolution and Carl Schmitt.Benjamin A. Schupmann - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (2):163-167.
    This article reflects on William E Scheuerman’s The End of Law and the value of the liberal rule of law. It puts Scheuerman’s concerns about Schmitt’s attacks on the liberal rule of law in dialogue with Schmitt’s theory of ‘legal revolution’. It argues that, although Schmitt was neither a liberal nor a democrat, his work on legal revolution can help liberals respond to populist attacks on liberal constitutional essentials.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Militant Democracy beyond Loewenstein: George van den Bergh’s 1936 Inaugural Lecture.Bastiaan Rijpkema - 2018 - In Afshin Ellian & Bastiaan Rijpkema (eds.), Militant Democracy – Political Science, Law and Philosophy. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 117-152.
    The German émigré political scientist and lawyer Karl Loewenstein is widely recognized as the ‘father’ of the concept of militant democracy. This is understandable, given his impressive comparative work on legal measures to protect democracy and the fact that he published in English and in internationally well-known journals. However, around the same time, other thinkers also wrestled with the same democratic dilemma of how to defend democracy against antidemocrats. This chapter introduces a largely neglected Dutch theorist of militant democracy: George (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Little room for exceptions: on misunderstanding Carl Schmitt.Andrea Salvatore & Mariano Croce - 2021 - History of European Ideas 47 (7):1169-1183.
    ABSTRACT Carl Schmitt is generally considered as the father of exceptionalism – the theory that the heart of politics lies in the sovereign power to issue emergency measures that suspend everyday normality. This is why his name comes up anytime state governments, whether liberal or not, impose limits on constitutional rights and freedoms to cope with emergencies. This article problematises such a received understanding. It argues that Schmitt held an exceptionalist view for a limited period of time and that even (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Democratic equality and militant democracy.Lars Vinx - 2020 - Constellations 27 (4):685-701.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Legality and Legitimacy.Carl Schmitt & Alexander Filippov - 2013 - Russian Sociological Review 12 (3):76-92.
    This is a translation of the afterword of Legality and Legitimacy, rewritten by Carl Schmitt in 1958 for his collection Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954. In the afterword, Schmitt once again describes the situation in Germany in the early 1930’s, and argues against the influential German lawyers who rejected his interpretation of the Weimar Constitution. He rejects the wide-spread opinion that he wanted a state of emergency in Germany to be introduced, and insists that this book was his final (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Constraining political extremism and legal revolution.Benjamin A. Schupmann - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (3):249-273.
    Recently, extremist ‘populist’ parties have succeeded in obtaining large enough democratic electoral mandates both to legally make substantive changes to the law and constitution and to legally eliminate avenues to challenge their control over the government. Extremists place committed liberal democrats in an awkward position as they work to legally revolutionize their constitutions and turn them into ‘illiberal democracies’. This article analyses political responses to this problem. It argues that the twin phenomena of legal revolution and illiberal democracy reveal a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Theory of Public Law in Germany 1914–1945.Stanley L. Paulson - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (3):525-545.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The enemy as the unthinkable: a concretist reading of Carl Schmitt’s conception of the political.Mariano Croce - 2017 - History of European Ideas 43 (8):1016-1028.
    ABSTRACTThis article offers an unconventional interpretation of Carl Schmitt’s conception of the political. It first identifies two alternative readings – an ‘exceptionalist’ and a ‘concretist’ one – to make the claim that in the late 1920s he laid the foundations for a theory of politics that overcame the flaws of his theory of exception. It then explains why the concretist reading provides an insightful key to Schmitt’s take on the relationship between politics and law as a whole. Despite this, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations