Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Privacy, intimacy, and personhood.Jeffrey Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • Where the rubber hits the road: Implications for organizational and clinical ethics in rural healthcare settings. [REVIEW]Ann Freeman Cook & Helena Hoas - 2000 - HEC Forum 12 (4):331-340.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Privacy and the Right to Privacy.H. J. McCloskey - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):17 - 38.
    The right to privacy is one of the rights most widely demanded today. Privacy has not always so been demanded. The reasons for the present concern for privacy are complex and obscure. They obviously relate both to the possibilities for very considerable enjoyment of privacy by the bulk of people living in affluent societies brought about by twentieth-century affluence, and to the development of very efficient methods of thoroughly and systematically invading this newly found privacy. However, interesting and important as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Genetic information and research: Emerging legal issues. [REVIEW]Roberta M. Berry - 2003 - HEC Forum 15 (1):70-99.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An Office on Main Street Health Care Dilemmas in Small Communities.Laura Weiss Roberts, John Battaglia, Margaret Smithpeter & Richard S. Epstein - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (4):28-37.
    The health care needs of rural populations often differ from those of their urban counterparts. And the ethical dilemmas that caregivers face are distinctively shaped in rural settings, not only by resource constraints, but by the nature of life in small, close-knit communities as well.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?A. Sommerville & V. English - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):144-150.
    In this paper we question whether the concept of "genetic privacy" is a contradiction in terms. And, if so, whether the implications of such a conclusion, inevitably impact on how society comes to perceive privacy and responsibility generally. Current law and ethical discourse place a high value on self-determination and the rights of individuals. In the medical sphere, the recognition of patient "rights" has resulted in health professionals being given clear duties of candour and frankness. Dilemmas arise, however, when patients (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations