Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Cognition Enhancement.Anders Sandberg - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 69–91.
    As cognitive neuroscience has advanced, the list of prospective internal, biological enhancements has steadily expanded. Education and training, as well as the use of external information‐processing devices, may be labeled as “conventional” means of cognition enhancement (CE). They are often well established and culturally accepted. By contrast, methods of enhancing cognition through “unconventional” means, such as ones involving deliberately created nootropic drugs, gene therapy, or neural implants, are nearly all to be regarded as experimental at the present time. Transcranial magnetic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Enhancement, Autonomy, and Authenticity.Niklas Juth - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 34–48.
    This chapter discusses some concerns regarding the effects of enhancement technologies on autonomy and authenticity, insofar as authenticity relates to autonomy. As a preliminary, it describes how enhancement and autonomy should be understood in this context along with some examples of enhancement. The chapter moves on to explain why enhancement can promote autonomy. Three types of concerns regarding the effect of enhancement technologies on autonomy are raised: (i) that medical technologies should not be used to enhance autonomy, since this is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Love in the Time of Quantified Relationships.Eric S. Swirsky & Andrew D. Boyd - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):35-37.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Let's Move Beyond Critique—But Please, Let's Not Depoliticize the Debate.Tamar Sharon - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):20-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Algorithmic Bloodhounds.Evan Selinger & Brett Frischmann - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):24-26.
    In “The Quantified Relationship” John Danaher, Sven Nyholm, and Brian Earp (2018) significantly enhance normative discussions about quantified relationships and their core technologies. Our modest...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Infotality: On Living, Loving, and Dying Through Information.Joel Michael Reynolds - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):33-35.
    Responding to Danaher et al. on self-tracking technologies, I argue that human lived experience is becoming increasingly mediated by generalized, statistical information, which I term our "infotality." Drawing on the work of Foucault, I argue that infotality is historically novel and best understood as the product of biopolitics, healthism, and informatics. I then critique the authors' "stance of cautious openness,” which misunderstands the aims of the technology in question and the fundamental ambiguity of the role information plays in the achievement (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci.Sven Nyholm - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1201-1219.
    Many ethicists writing about automated systems attribute agency to these systems. Not only that; they seemingly attribute an autonomous or independent form of agency to these machines. This leads some ethicists to worry about responsibility-gaps and retribution-gaps in cases where automated systems harm or kill human beings. In this paper, I consider what sorts of agency it makes sense to attribute to most current forms of automated systems, in particular automated cars and military robots. I argue that whereas it indeed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • El Gran Teatro del Mundo.Emilio Mordini - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):37-38.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Relational Autonomy and the Quantified Relationship.Hannah Martens & Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):39-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Phallus-y Fallacy: On Unsexy Intimate Tracking.Karen Levy - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):22-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Phenomenological Considerations of Sex Tracking Technology.Karola Kreitmair - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):31-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Politics of Quantified Relationships.Gordon Hull - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):29-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Swiping Left on the Quantified Relationship: Exploring the Potential Soft Impacts.Lily Frank & Michał Klincewicz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):27-28.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • When is diminishment a form of enhancement? : rethinking the enhancement debate in biomedical ethics.Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - unknown
    The enhancement debate in neuroscience and biomedical ethics tends to focus on the augmentation of certain capacities or functions: memory, learning, attention, and the like. Typically, the point of contention is whether these augmentative enhancements should be considered permissible for individuals with no particular “medical” disadvantage along any of the dimensions of interest. Less frequently addressed in the literature, however, is the fact that sometimes the _diminishment_ of a capacity or function, under the right set of circumstances, could plausibly contribute (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • The Medicalization of Love.Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):759-771.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • The Medicalization of Love.Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (3):323-336.
    Pharmaceuticals or other emerging technologies could be used to enhance (or diminish) feelings of lust, attraction, and attachment in adult romantic partnerships. While such interventions could conceivably be used to promote individual (and couple) well-being, their widespread development and/or adoption might lead to “medicalization” of human love and heartache—for some, a source of serious concern. In this essay, we argue that the “medicalization of love” need not necessarily be problematic, on balance, but could plausibly be expected to have either good (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • The Quantified Relationship.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-19.
    The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The Benefits and Risks of Quantified Relationship Technologies: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Quantified Relationship”.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-6.
    The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Ethical issues in human enhancement.Nick Bostrom & Rebecca Roache - 2007 - In J. Ryberg, T. Petersen & C. Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 120--152.
    Human enhancement has emerged in recent years as a blossoming topic in applied ethics. With continuing advances in science and technology, people are beginning to realize that some of the basic parameters of the human condition might be changed in the future. One important way in which the human condition could be changed is through the enhancement of basic human capacities. If this becomes feasible within the lifespan of many people alive today, then it is important now to consider the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations