Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas.A. J. Wilkie & J. B. Paris - 1987 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 35 (C):261-302.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • Pell equations and exponentiation in fragments of arithmetic.Paola D'Aquino - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 77 (1):1-34.
    We study the relative strength of the two axioms Every Pell equation has a nontrivial solution Exponentiation is total over weak fragments, and we show they are equivalent over IE1. We then define the graph of the exponential function using only existentially bounded quantifiers in the language of arithmetic expanded with the symbol #, where # = x[log2y]. We prove the recursion laws of exponentiation in the corresponding fragment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Provability of the pigeonhole principle and the existence of infinitely many primes.J. B. Paris, A. J. Wilkie & A. R. Woods - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1235-1244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Combinatorial principles in elementary number theory.Alessandro Berarducci & Benedetto Intrigila - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 55 (1):35-50.
    We prove that the theory IΔ0, extended by a weak version of the Δ0-Pigeonhole Principle, proves that every integer is the sum of four squares (Lagrange's theorem). Since the required weak version is derivable from the theory IΔ0 + ∀x (xlog(x) exists), our results give a positive answer to a question of Macintyre (1986). In the rest of the paper we consider the number-theoretical consequences of a new combinatorial principle, the ‘Δ0-Equipartition Principle’ (Δ0EQ). In particular we give a new proof, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Existence and feasibility in arithmetic.Rohit Parikh - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):494-508.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations