Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children's inductive judgment.Yafen Lo, Ashley Sides, Joseph Rozelle & Daniel Osherson - 2002 - Cognitive Science 26 (2):181-206.
    A familiar adage in the philosophy of science is that general hypotheses are better supported by varied evidence than by uniform evidence. Several studies suggest that young children do not respect this principle, and thus suffer from a defect in their inductive methodology. We argue that the diversity principle does not have the normative status that psychologists attribute to it, and should be replaced by a simple rule of probability. We then report experiments designed to detect conformity to the latter (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • On the reality of cognitive illusions.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):582-591.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   148 citations  
  • Category-based induction.Daniel N. Osherson, Edward E. Smith, Ormond Wilkie & Alejandro López - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (2):185-200.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   146 citations  
  • On the psychology of prediction.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.
    Considers that intuitive predictions follow a judgmental heuristic-representativeness. By this heuristic, people predict the outcome that appears most representative of the evidence. Consequently, intuitive predictions are insensitive to the reliability of the evidence or to the prior probability of the outcome, in violation of the logic of statistical prediction. The hypothesis that people predict by representativeness was supported in a series of studies with both naive and sophisticated university students. The ranking of outcomes by likelihood coincided with the ranking by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   429 citations  
  • The problem of induction.Steven A. Sloman & D. Lagnado - 2005 - In K. Holyoak & B. Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 95--116.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Conceptual Differences Between Children and Adults.Susan Carey - 1988 - Mind and Language 3 (3):167-181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: Evidence for developmental change.Marjorie Rhodes, Daniel Brickman & Susan A. Gelman - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):543-556.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill?Christopher Jepson, David H. Krantz & Richard E. Nisbett - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):494.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.Richard E. Nisbett, David H. Krantz, Christopher Jepson & Ziva Kunda - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):339-363.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  • The Effects of Statistical Training on Thinking about Everyday Problems.Geoffrey T. Fong Richard E. Nisbett & David H. Krantz - 1993 - In Richard E. Nisbett (ed.), Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Children's Use of Sample Size and Diversity Information within Basic-Level Categories.Grant Gutheil & Susan A. Gelman - 1997 - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64:159-174.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Properties of inductive reasoning.Evan Heit - 2000 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7:569-592.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations