Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Right to Withdraw from Research.G. Owen Schaefer & Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):329-352.
    The right to withdraw from participation in research is recognized in virtually all national and international guidelines for research on human subjects. It is therefore surprising that there has been little justification for that right in the literature. We argue that the right to withdraw should protect research participants from information imbalance, inability to hedge, inherent uncertainty, and untoward bodily invasion, and it serves to bolster public trust in the research enterprise. Although this argument is not radical, it provides a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Contested Commodities.Margaret Jane Radin - 1996 - Harvard Univ Pr.
    In recent years, the free market position has been gaining strength. In this book, Radin provides a nuanced response to its sweeping generalization.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  • Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.World Medical Association - 2009 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 14 (1):233-238.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   313 citations  
  • What's so special about medicine?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1):379-380.
    Health care has increasingly come to be understood as a commodity. The ethical implications of such an understanding are significant. The author argues that health care is not a commodity because health care (1) is non-proprietary, (2) serves the needs of persons who, as patients, are uniquely vulnerable, (3) essentially involves a special human relationship which ought not be bought or sold, (4) helps to define what is meant by necessity and cannot be considered a commodity when subjected to rigorous (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):3-12.
    Current orthodoxy in research ethics assumes that subjects of clinical trials reserve rights to withdraw at any time and without giving any reason. This view sees the right to withdraw as a simple extension of the right to refuse to participate all together. In this paper, however, I suggest that subjects should assume some responsibilities for the internal validity of the trial at consent and that these responsibilities should be captured by contract. This would allow the researcher to impose a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Physician and Patient; or, a Practical View of the Mutual Duties, Relations and Interests of the Medical Profession and the Community.Worthington Hooker & Burder - 1849 - Baker & Scribner.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations