Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia.Bernard Suits & Thomas Hurka - 1978 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
    In the mid twentieth century the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein famously asserted that games are indefinable; there are no common threads that link them all. "Nonsense," says the sensible Bernard Suits: "playing a game is a voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles." The short book Suits wrote demonstrating precisely that is as playful as it is insightful, as stimulating as it is delightful. Suits not only argues that games can be meaningfully defined; he also suggests that playing games is a central (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   342 citations  
  • A Critique of Violent Retaliation in Sport.Nicholas Dixon - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (1):1-10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Intentional Rules Violations—One More Time.Warren P. Fraleigh - 2003 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 30 (2):166-176.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • The Value of Dangerous Sport.J. S. Russell - 2005 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1):1-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Moral saints.Susan Wolf - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (8):419-439.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   381 citations  
  • For Ownership Theory: A Response to Nicholas Dixon.Stephen Kershnar - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (2):226-235.
    In an earlier paper, Stephen Kershnar argued for the following thesis: An instance of trash-talking is permissible if and only if the relevant sports organization’s system of rules permits the expression. One person trash-talks a second if and only if the first intentionally insults the second during competition. The above theory sounds implausible. Surely, the conditions under which a player may insult another do not depend on what the owners arbitrarily decide. Such an approach doesn’t appear to be true in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Moral Rules of Trash Talking: Morality and Ownership.Stephen Kershnar - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (3):303-323.
    This paper argues that an instance of trash-talking is permissible if and only if the relevant sports organization’s system of rules permits the expression. The argument for this position rests on the notion that if there is no relevant side-constraint on trash-talking, then if the player commits to a moral boundary on trash-talking then that is the moral boundary on trash-talking. I then argued that there is no relevant side-constraint on trash-talking and that the players commit to the ownership theory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1730 citations  
  • The Intrinsic Wrongness of Trash Talking and How It Diminishes the Practice of Sport: Reply to Kershnar.Nicholas Dixon - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (2):211-225.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Why Sports Morally Matter.William John Morgan - 2006 - Routledge.
    Exploring the broad historical context of modern America, this book argues that the state of sports is a powerful indictment of a wealth-driven society and hyper-individualistic way of life.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Consent and Right Action in Sport.Steven Weimer - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):11-31.
    This paper argues that recent treatments of ethics in sport have accorded too much importance to the promotion and portrayal of a sport’s excellences, and too little to the consent of participants First, I consider and reject a fundamental challenge to the idea that consent should play a central role in determining the morality of action in sport – namely, Sean McAleer’s argument to the effect that consent is incapable of rendering normally impermissible actions permissible in sport. I then offer (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Trash talking, respect for opponents and good competition.Nicholas Dixon - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):96 – 106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • (1 other version)Romantic love, appraisal, and commitment.Nicholas Dixon - 2007 - Philosophical Forum 38 (4):373–386.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Ethics of Strategic Fouling:A Reply to Fraleigh.Robert L. Simon - 2005 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1):87-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations