Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2000 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    This new work provides an approachable introduction to the complex system that Making It Explicit mapped out.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   474 citations  
  • The formalization of ockham's theory of supposition.Graham Priest & Stephen Read - 1977 - Mind 86 (341):109-113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Tractatus de consequentiis (excerpt).Jonas Buridanas - 2022 - Problemos 102:183-203.
    Iš lotynų kalbos vertė, pratarmę ir paaiškinimus parašė Živilė Pabijutaitė.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):123-125.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   344 citations  
  • Buridan's divided modal syllogistic.Anthony Willing - 1991 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (2):276-289.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan.G. Klima - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):592-593.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • A New Presentation of Ockham's Theory of Supposition with an Evaluation of some Contemporary Criticisms.John J. Swiniarski - 1970 - Franciscan Studies 30 (1):181-217.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Consequences of a closed, token-based semantics: the case of John Buridan.Gyula Klima - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2):95-110.
    This paper argues for two principal conclusions about natural language semantics based on John Buridan's considerations concerning the notion of formal consequence, that is, formally valid inference. (1) Natural languages are essentially semantically closed, yet they do not have to be on that account inconsistent. (2) Natural language semantics has to be token based, as a matter of principle. The paper investigates the Buridanian considerations leading to these conclusions, and considers some obviously emerging objections to the Buridanian approach.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Modes of Personal Supposition: The Purpose and Usefulness of the Doctrine within Ockham's Logic.Elizabeth Karger - 1984 - Franciscan Studies 44 (1):87-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Multiple quantification and the use of special quantifiers in early sixteenth century logic.E. J. Ashworth - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (4):599-613.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Robert B. Brandom, Articulating Reasons (An Introduction to Inferentialism). [REVIEW]Robert B. Brandom - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (1):121-127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   260 citations