Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Common valence coding in action and evaluation: Affective blindness towards response-compatible stimuli.Andreas B. Eder & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (6):1297-1322.
    A common coding account of bidirectional evaluation–behaviour interactions proposes that evaluative attributes of stimuli and responses are coded in a common representational format. This assumption was tested in two experiments that required evaluations of positive and negative stimuli during the generation of a positively or negatively charged motor response. The results of both experiments revealed a reduced evaluative sensitivity (d′) towards response-compatible stimulus valences. This action–valence blindness supports the notion of a common valence coding in action and evaluation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks.R. Hans Phaf, Sören E. Mohr, Mark Rotteveel & Jelte M. Wicherts - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Bernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben & Wolfgang Prinz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):849-878.
    Traditional approaches to human information processing tend to deal with perception and action planning in isolation, so that an adequate account of the perception-action interface is still missing. On the perceptual side, the dominant cognitive view largely underestimates, and thus fails to account for, the impact of action-related processes on both the processing of perceptual information and on perceptual learning. On the action side, most approaches conceive of action planning as a mere continuation of stimulus processing, thus failing to account (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   342 citations  
  • Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.Julia Kozlik, Roland Neumann & Ljubica Lozo - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What is an Emotion?William James - 1884 - Mind 9:188.
    A perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing material composed of a uniaxial anisotropic material is presented for the truncation of finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) lattices. It is shown that the uniaxial PML material formulation is mathematically equivalent to the perfectly matched layer method published by Berenger (see J. Computat. Phys., Oct. 1994). However, unlike Berenger's technique, the uniaxial PML absorbing medium presented in this paper is based on a Maxwellian formulation. Numerical examples demonstrate that the FDTD implementation of the uniaxial PML medium (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   744 citations  
  • Anticipatory Control of Approach and Avoidance: An Ideomotor Approach.Andreas B. Eder & Bernhard Hommel - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):275-279.
    This article reviews evidence suggesting that the cause of approach and avoidance behavior lies not so much in the presence (i.e., the stimulus) but, rather, in the behavior’s anticipated future consequences (i.e., the goal): Approach is motivated by the goal to produce a desired consequence or end-state, while avoidance is motivated by the goal to prevent an undesired consequence or end-state. However, even though approach and avoidance are controlled by goals rather than stimuli, affective stimuli can influence action control by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations